Spoiler-free thoughts on The Forever War


Joe Haldeman’s Forever War was on my radar for a while, but it actually moved into the queue last year, after seeing HP at Every Day Should Be Tuesday had given it a 5/5. I didn’t actually read HP’s review until now, though, since the writeup is rather meaty and quite spoilery. I’m going to share some more in-depth thoughts, myself, in another post. For now, a few general thoughts.

Oh, and for what it’s worth, I read the Author’s Preferred Edition, which apparently restores some material that was originally rejected by Ben Bova and changed when the story was serialized in Analog magazine.

1. It wasn’t what I was expecting. Going into this, I thought I was going to get some straight-up Military SF. Not exactly. HP says “It’s not just a military SF novel, it’s a war novel…” And that’s not wrong.

If I had to categorize it (as we love to do), I’d be tempted to throw it in with 1984 (which was also set against a backdrop of perpetual war; at least so the reader is told), or Brave New World, or Fahrenheit 451The Forever War, for me at least, is a dystopian story framed by a futuristic war against an alien race.


The first time the story shifted away from the military side of things, I was thrown for a major loop. Things get rather bleak, but the Forever War is also very thoughtful and thought-provoking.

2. On that note, there’s a lot of 70’s thinking in the book, especially when it comes to sexuality. Also population growth and bureaucracy. The directions Haldeman goes with these elements wasn’t what I was expecting, though (see #1 above).

3. For a good chunk of the book, I was reminded of both Heinlein’s Starship Troopers and Stranger in a Strange Land. Positives and negatives apply.


4. It’s quite crunchy on its science (the protagonist is, after all, a physicist). Maybe it’s because I’ve now read enough Niven to kind of gloss over these parts and absorb what I can without getting too hung up on it, but I wasn’t bored by the “sciency” elements, and my eyes did not glaze.

5. The ending was satisfying enough. I’ll leave it at that for now.

I didn’t love it enough to give it a full 5/5, but it was quite a good read. 4.5/5. 




6 thoughts on “Spoiler-free thoughts on The Forever War

  1. Sounds very interesting. I’ll try it. Military Sci-Fi is a subgenre that’s totally uncharted for me, so after I’ve finished Starship Troopers I’ll give The Forever War a try. Although everyone that I know who has read the book say the same thing; the sequels are trash and should be avoided.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think Gitabushi recommends a couple other of Haldeman’s books, but yeah, I don’t think he liked the sequels. I don’t plan to check them out, either. ;)


  2. Yep. For Haldeman, I loved The Forever War, There is No Darkness, the short story collection Dealing in Futures (with the *wonderful* story “A !Tangled Web”, and the novella in Alien Stars.
    I’ve heard good things bout the Hemingway Hoax.
    But nothing else did it for me. I have no idea how he can be *so good* in some material, and so Scalzi in others.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s